Page 1 of 1

Separating retail banking from commercially risky investment

PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 1:08 am
by ghostgirl
in the few minutes a day when the BBC News ISN'T banging on about swine flu, "Banking" has been the talk of the day. What I want to know is, is this idea of "Separating retail banking from commercially risky investment" that they're discussing right now, a good thing for us? Or is it playing right into the hands of what the NWO wants?


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8026589.stm

Bankers made 'astonishing mess'

The effects of the continuing banking crisis will be felt for generations, a committee of MPs has warned.

The Treasury Committee, in its second report on the crisis, said it had been caused largely by the banks' own reckless behaviour.

"Bankers have made an astonishing mess of the financial system," said committee chairman John McFall.

The MPs supported the various attempts of the government to bail out the banks and the shore up the banking system.

But they criticised banks for increasing their charges and fees to small business borrowers.

"The culture within parts of British banking has increasingly been one of risk taking, leading to the meltdown that we have witnessed," said John McFall, chairman of the committee.


Repercussions

The MPs said they favoured greater regulation to protect bank depositors.

And they called for further consideration of the idea of separating High Street retail banking from the more commercially risky investment banking.


The committee supported the government's approach of taking a direct stake in banks which were being rescued with the help of taxpayers' money.

But the MPs said that the details of the bank investments being guaranteed under the recently launched asset protection scheme should be disclosed, with the public being told what the assets are, how much they are worth, and how much value they might eventually lose.

"The repercussions of this banking crisis are being felt, and will continue to be felt, by ordinary people for many generations," Mr McFall said.

"Looking to the future, the rebuilding of consumer trust is key," he added.


Deplorable behaviour

As well as criticising the behaviour of banks in the past few years leading up to the start of the international financial crisis, the MPs also criticised their current lending polices.

The MPs held several sessions in the regions to gather evidence outside London.

And they were told that, contrary to the claims now being made by banks, many small businesses were finding it very hard to obtain loans, except with much higher charges and fees.

"The committee deplores the behaviour of a number of those banks who have received so much public money and behaved in such an insensitive manner, particularly to established customers," said Mr McFall.

"There is clearly an unresolved inconsistency between, on the one hand, bankers' assurances that they are increasing their lending and, on the other hand, widespread and clearly sincere complaints that credit is difficult to obtain and increasingly expensive," he said.

The MPs are showing due deference
to the Governor of the Bank of England...
They won't dismiss his view "lightly".
But nor do they sign up for it


The British Bankers Association (BBA) replied that anecdotal evidence from disgruntled bank customers having a hard time in the recession had not given the MPs an accurate picture.

"Hard data from many sources - such as the BBA, the Bank of England and BERR - confirm banks are continuing to lend," said the BBA.

"The latest figures show bank lending to small businesses has increased by 5% in the last 12 months," it added.


Deposit protection

One organisation praised by the MPs was the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

The committee said the scheme had developed a number of "innovative solutions" to deal with the collapse of several banks in the UK.

But the MPs said banks should make it clear to their customers exactly which of their subsidiaries carried separate deposit protection.

And they recommended that each brand name run by a bank should have a separate banking license, which would trigger such cover.

The committee also appears to be showing due deference to the Governor of the Bank of England, says the BBC's business editor Robert Peston.

They won't dismiss his view that "a separation of retail from investment banking functions is 'very attractive'", but nor do they sign up for it, our correspondent says.