Page 7 of 7

Apollo 17 - will we ever return?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:08 pm
by Channel Hopper
smeggypants wrote:Look at the lift off of Apollo 17 here... The jet blast is really long and stuff is being blown about even when the craft is high above the surface ...





C'mon Smeggy, you know it's a fake, the bungee ropes have been photoshopped out of the picture.

Apollo 17 - will we ever return?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:51 pm
by smeggypants
Channel Hopper wrote:
smeggypants wrote:Look at the lift off of Apollo 17 here... The jet blast is really long and stuff is being blown about even when the craft is high above the surface ...





C'mon Smeggy, you know it's a fake, the bungee ropes have been photoshopped out of the picture.


OK I concede. I think I saw a discarded chewing gum wrapper on the Apollo 11 pics.

Apollo 17 - will we ever return?

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:52 am
by annie27
smeggypants wrote:
Channel Hopper wrote:
smeggypants wrote:Look at the lift off of Apollo 17 here... The jet blast is really long and stuff is being blown about even when the craft is high above the surface ...





C'mon Smeggy, you know it's a fake, the bungee ropes have been photoshopped out of the picture.


OK I concede. I think I saw a discarded chewing gum wrapper on the Apollo 11 pics.


I am just delighted that you actually have now posted that you concede that apollo 11 may have been faked :D :elephant:

Apollo 17 - will we ever return?

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 2:57 am
by annie27
LordNibbler wrote:
annie27 wrote:My Goodness ....so your final analysis is ....you know much more than this man who makes special effects programmes for a living and he is wrong because he has a beard ???? did I get that right ? :howl:


In this particular case, yes, that is a perfectly fair assessment. It doesn't matter whether you believe me or not Annie, the simple fact is that guy is wrong on those so-called points he hopes to make. You claim to have an open mind so be open to the possibility that he is spouting a load of crap because I can assure you, he is.

Surely you can ask yourself, how it is remotely possible for two thin wires to create great big splodges of light like that? Light needs a surface to reflect off - thin wires do not have sufficient surface area to generate that type of reflection. It just isn't possible. And it's lens flare as I said.

And let me ask you, do you believe all that he said in that segment? I'd really like to know on this point please because I want to understand how you decide whether to trust him.

LN


I don't trust everything he says ....I just posted it because you asked me to .... :roll: my question was why does he want to disprove that man landed on the moon ? :chin:
But if it comes down to me trusting what Government says vs Joe Public ,I know who my money is going on :thumb:

Apollo 17 - will we ever return?

PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:33 pm
by LordNibbler
Thanks. Incidentally, I asked you to post the link because you were quoting the wires footage as justification for believing it was hoaxed.

Why does he want to disprove the landings? Well, ask him because I can only speculate - maybe he sees it as his moment of fame, his time in the limelight, appearing on television, making himself well-known in the conspiracy sect and so on. Makes good talk at parties no doubt. Why does anyone want to disprove the landings when so far, there isn't a single shred of evidence to support the hoax claim? I suppose people get a kick out of thinking that the system is always conning them and they represent a lone voice of sanity and truth againt the might of the machine. Nothing wrong with that really but in the case of Apollo, it is a waste of breath unless someone really comes up with the smoking-gun that proves the hoaxers' claims once and for all.

I am generally with you on the Government vs Joe Public debate but sometimes, Joe Public gets it wrong and has his own hidden agenda. Each case on their own merit.

LN