Council Elections

[Resonance]

Anything funky going to happen??

Cons and Lib Dems losing loads I reckon (obviously). Would be nice to see 'others' doing well.

Results on BBC1 starting now.

[smeggypants]

Just got it on. LibLabCon will win. they always do

[Resonance]

Just got it on. LibLabCon will win. they always do

Yep.....UKIP vote up though, apparently Cons worried about it

[smeggypants]

Just got it on. LibLabCon will win. they always do

Yep.....UKIP vote up though, apparently Cons worried about it

Youshould put Lee nelson on BBC3 right now there's some bikini babes on - one of them is a man

[smeggypants]

too late - missed it. back to LIbLabCon

[Resonance]

too late - missed it. back to LIbLabCon

Okay Smeggy. Good one

[Resonance]

Eric Pickles is on and getting in a beef

[smeggypants]

too late - missed it. back to LIbLabCon

Okay Smeggy. Good one

the one that was born a man was teh best lookin!!!!

[Resonance]

too late - missed it. back to LIbLabCon

Okay Smeggy. Good one

the one that was born a man was teh best lookin!!!!

[Resonance]

They keep going on about a low turnout. Not surprising when Con/Lib/Lab are all a bunch of wankers.

A better system would be good......PR.

[smeggypants]

They keep going on about a low turnout. Not surprising when Con/Lib/Lab are all a bunch of wankers.

A better system would be good......PR.

PR would be much better. But even better gid of parties altogether. The views of the populace isn't divided into 2.5 segments. it's impossible to have democracy under the current system.

The only benefit of having a 2 party or 2.5 party system is for the Elite that bankroll them. parties are so easy to control. All you have to do is bankroll a few key figures into the top seats ( Cameron Osborne, etc, all of whome went ot the same schools as Rothschild and have been to the Rothschild soirées and meetings ) and the rest of the party toes the line under the whip. That's not democracy that's the structure of a private company where the pyramid structure calls the shots.

Democracy is equal access to power which means EVERYONE's vote carries equal weight.

The 2.5 party system also encourages career politicians who simply join one of the parties in order to give them an advantage to get elected

[Resonance]

Respect +4 so far in Bradford apparently.

[Resonance]

They keep going on about a low turnout. Not surprising when Con/Lib/Lab are all a bunch of wankers.

A better system would be good......PR.

PR would be much better. But even better gid of parties altogether. The views of the populace isn't divided into 2.5 segments. it's impossible to have democracy under the current system.

The only benefit of having a 2 party or 2.5 party system is for the Elite that bankroll them. parties are so easy to control. All you have to do is bankroll a few key figures into the top seats ( Cameron Osborne, etc, all of whome went ot the same schools as Rothschild and have been to the Rothschild soirées and meetings ) and the rest of the party toes the line under the whip. That's not democracy that's the structure of a private company where the pyramid structure calls the shots.

Democracy is equal access to power which means EVERYONE's vote carries equal weight.

The 2.5 party system also encourages career politicians who simply join one of the parties in order to give them an advantage to get elected

PR though would make it worth voting. PR would mean that Con/Lab would never get a majority by themselves again, which can only be a good thing.

Unfortunately PR is never going to be allowed to happen because it would mean people could voice their views.


Getting rid of parties would be amazing, can't see it ever happening though.

[smeggypants]

Respect +4 so far in Bradford apparently.

Yeah Mr Galloway has been tweeting about it ( I'm following him of course )


the only encouraging thing about British Politics is more and more people are waking up to the fact that the system is geared up to the Elite.

How much longer can the rest of the them keep voting for labour when the Tories fail and then vote for the Tories when labour fail? The only beneficiaries of this political cycle is the Elite.

Obama used the crass keyword 'Change'. Cameron used the crass keyword 'Change' - I noticed on twitter many Labour candidates are using the the keyword 'Change'. It's pathetic. it wasn't change with Obama, it wasn't change with Cameron and it won't be change iwth labour again

[Resonance]

Nothing changes.

As the old saying goes (ish) "Whoever you vote for you end up with a government" (council in tonight's case).

[crumbs]

I'm glad that Respect have done well.

But what scares me is that we might get Labour in again. It'll be more of the same. Virtually the entire Labour would-be cabinet would swear their allegiance to Israel, just like the Lib Dems and the Tories have done.

We'll then be engaged in perpetual wars for Israel and the Ruling Elite. We'll be told to celebrate the business of death and be proud of the devastation and death that we bring to other countries. Those lucky enough to have a job will see more of their earned income taken away from them.

The country will become more divided and there will be more suspicion of your neighbours. The far-right mindset will be instilled in the populous and reinforced by false flag operations by our security services.

Our lives will be less free and we will be spied upon even more.

Sorry, but I can't see anything improving in Britain for the rest of my life.

[Morgan le Fay]

Best story so far - Goldie Lookin' Chain get elected.

[Resonance]

Best story so far - Goldie Lookin' Chain get elected.

[smeggypants]

Best story so far - Goldie Lookin' Chain get elected.

LOL

Guns Don't Kill People, Politicians Do

[crumbs]

What happened to the Lib Dems and the BNP? God-willing, they have been vanished from the pages of history.

The Lib Dems should stick to bumming each other and defrauding taxpayers, whilst the BNP should stick to football hooliganism.