Page 1 of 2

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:37 pm
by Dolls
Alison Weirs book on Anne Boleyn, totally fascinating,so much research,she is more or less saying ( through research) that Henry wasn't the instigator, which I've lays had my thoughts on the subject.. Very good book but need to take breaks so much info. :doh:

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:45 pm
by wotsit2
anne bolelyn was the victim of one hell of a stitch up :(

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:46 pm
by wotsit2
Dolls wrote:Alison Weirs book on Anne Boleyn, totally fascinating,so much research,she is more or less saying ( through research) that Henry wasn't the instigator, which I've lays had my thoughts on the subject.. Very good book but need to take breaks so much info. :doh:

may i borrow your book when you've done please dolls ? xxxx

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:47 pm
by Stanley Tweedle
Henry VIII was a(head) of his time *snigger*

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:50 pm
by wotsit2
only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:54 pm
by Stanley Tweedle
Isn't he a hero though? It stopped us men having to accuse our women of being a witch to get rid of em. We still did that though... Just for a laugh of course.

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:56 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:Alison Weirs book on Anne Boleyn, totally fascinating,so much research,she is more or less saying ( through research) that Henry wasn't the instigator, which I've lays had my thoughts on the subject.. Very good book but need to take breaks so much info. :doh:

may i borrow your book when you've done please dolls ? xxxx



It's on me iPad ! :oops:

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:57 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The second one Anne is what the books about it was jealousy and intrigue,she was obviously stitched up!

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 5:58 pm
by Stanley Tweedle
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:Alison Weirs book on Anne Boleyn, totally fascinating,so much research,she is more or less saying ( through research) that Henry wasn't the instigator, which I've lays had my thoughts on the subject.. Very good book but need to take breaks so much info. :doh:

may i borrow your book when you've done please dolls ? xxxx



It's on me iPad ! :oops:


Lend him your ipad then lol

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:05 pm
by wotsit2
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The second one Anne is what the books about it was jealousy and intrigue,she was obviously stitched up!

i meant the second beheading dolls , sorry . catherine howard , it was for treason against the king and adultery .
didn't mean anne :)

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:13 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The second one Anne is what the books about it was jealousy and intrigue,she was obviously stitched up!

i meant the second beheading dolls , sorry . catherine howard , it was for treason against the king and adultery .
didn't mean anne :)




She was 5th wife, remember she was only 17yrs old,he was a obese fucker that stank had huge ulcers on his legs through syphilis. It must have been vile and remember her family pushed her to marry him for their own ends. :(

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:16 pm
by wotsit2
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The second one Anne is what the books about it was jealousy and intrigue,she was obviously stitched up!

i meant the second beheading dolls , sorry . catherine howard , it was for treason against the king and adultery .
didn't mean anne :)




She was 5th wife, remember she was only 17yrs old,he was a obese fucker that stank had huge ulcers on his legs through syphilis. It must have been vile and remember her family pushed her to marry him for their own ends. :(

wern't the boleyns involved in that somewhere along the line :chin:

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:22 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:only twice stan , the second one was well deserved though

The second one Anne is what the books about it was jealousy and intrigue,she was obviously stitched up!

i meant the second beheading dolls , sorry . catherine howard , it was for treason against the king and adultery .
didn't mean anne :)




She was 5th wife, remember she was only 17yrs old,he was a obese fucker that stank had huge ulcers on his legs through syphilis. It must have been vile and remember her family pushed her to marry him for their own ends. :(

wern't the boleyns involved in that somewhere along the line :chin:




Boleyns were part of the Howard family but by the time Catherine or Katherine came to the throne Boleyns were more or less wiped out. But the Howard (Norfolk)!trait continued.

Still do!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_family
http://queenelizabeth1.wetpaint.com/pag ... amily+Tree

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:24 pm
by wotsit2
poor lady jane grey was a relative of the boleyns too wasn't she dolls ?

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:29 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:poor lady jane grey was a relative of the boleyns too wasn't she dolls ?



She was great grand daughter of Henry V11 (Henry V111s) father,she was named on Henry v111 son Edward V1 deathbed as successor, he overlooked Mary his half sister as she was if the catholic faith.

No she didn't have ties to the Howard family.

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:38 pm
by wotsit2
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:poor lady jane grey was a relative of the boleyns too wasn't she dolls ?



She was great grand daughter of Henry V11 (Henry V111s) father,she was named on Henry v111 son Edward V1 deathbed as successor, he overlooked Mary his half sister as she was if the catholic faith.

No she didn't have ties to the Howard family.

noooooo meant the boleyns dolls . wasn't there a connection there with the bolelyns and the queen of nine days ?

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:51 pm
by Dolls
wotsit2 wrote:
Dolls wrote:
wotsit2 wrote:poor lady jane grey was a relative of the boleyns too wasn't she dolls ?



She was great grand daughter of Henry V11 (Henry V111s) father,she was named on Henry v111 son Edward V1 deathbed as successor, he overlooked Mary his half sister as she was if the catholic faith.

No she didn't have ties to the Howard family.

noooooo meant the boleyns dolls . wasn't there a connection there with the bolelyns and the queen of nine days ?



No to Catherine Howard yes not LJG.

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:54 pm
by Dolls
Also connection to Jane Seymour Henry's 3rd wife,that's where you maybe getting confused.

http://onthetudortrail.com/Blog/2013/02 ... e-seymour/


Lady Janes tree is the Suffolks,the Howard's ie: Boleyn and Catherine Howard the norfolks.

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:34 pm
by wotsit2
Dolls wrote:Also connection to Jane Seymour Henry's 3rd wife,that's where you maybe getting confused.

http://onthetudortrail.com/Blog/2013/02 ... e-seymour/


Lady Janes tree is the Suffolks,the Howard's ie: Boleyn and Catherine Howard the norfolks.



:doh: :doh: :doh: yep , you're quite correct dolls :doh: :doh: :doh: :oops: :oops: :oops:
my appologees :)

The Lady In The Tower

PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:36 pm
by Channel Hopper
Dolls wrote:
She was 5th wife, remember she was only 17yrs old,he was a obese fucker that stank had huge ulcers on his legs through syphilis. It must have been vile and remember her family pushed her to marry him for their own ends. :(


He was nothing like that Dolls, I saw at least two episodes of that biography 'The Tudors' and it's the troof. :hyenas: