ghostgirl wrote: Salazar wrote: smeggypants wrote: annie27 wrote: Salazar wrote: annie27 wrote:
Very interesting From 1988......
I'll take your word for that.
I dont want you to take MY word
maybe that is the problem you have ,accepting things without questioning them for yourself .
or not accepting them without looking into them if it's something that goes against the Ruling Elite's narrowly defined worldview
Yes indeed. I accept everything at face value. I question nothing and accept everything. I am a useful idiot as is anyone who disagrees with Smeggy. There is no middle ground. People either accept everything they're told by the mainstream media or they're incisive, sharp and penetrating like
Smeggy, Annie and Ghostie
and know how the world really
works. In such a case it is perfectly understandable that those really in the know feel compelled to be patronising and condescending to others unfortunate enough to be born naive and trusting.
I'm speaking for Me, only. I do not adhere to such a stupid Hegelian ethic at all, in fact I generally hold almost all either/or arguments in contempt. Nothing is black and white, and I do not know why you would say such a thing about me. I hadn't even previously commented on this thread.
Same here. I do witness an awful lot of binary thinking though. I'm often accused of not believing anything
the politicians, media, Ruling Elite say, because I don't believe what they say on several subjects. Likewise I'm often accused of being a supported of Islam because I criticise and condemn the Western ruling elite's war on Islam.
Such a 2 state world is retarded and summed up by the infamous and stupid George W Bush ..."You are either with us or with the terrorists" bollocks.
FWIW I don't feel superior to anyone, let alone those who trust the word of the ruling Elite. I just don't understand why someone would take on trust the word of proven liars. It just doesn't make any sense.